[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150312155422.GA9779@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:54:22 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 0/6] perf kmem: Implement page allocation analysis
(v1)
* Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> > I.e. something like this (mockup) output:
> >
> > SUMMARY (page allocator)
> > ========================
> >
> > Pages allocated+freed: 12,593 [ 51,630,080 bytes ]
> >
> > Pages allocated-only: 2,342 [ 1,235,010 bytes ]
> > Pages freed-only: 67 [ 135,311 bytes ]
> >
> > Page allocation failures : 0
>
> Looks a lot better!
>
> One thing I need to tell you is that the numbers are not pages but
> requests.
Yes, but in the MM code we tend to call larger order allocations
'pages' as well: higher order pages, such as a 2MB hugepage, or a 8K
order-1 page. So at least in MM-speak it should be OK to call them
'pages'.
But your call!
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists