[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150312185336.GA30371@gradator.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 19:53:36 +0100
From: Sylvain Rochet <sylvain.rochet@...secur.com>
To: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>
Cc: nicolas.ferre@...el.com, linux@...im.org.za,
linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
patrice.vilchez@...el.com, sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com,
mark.rutland@....com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] pm: at91: move the copying the sram function to the
sram initializationi phase
Hello Wenyou,
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 12:22:24AM +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> Hello Wenyou,
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:46:49AM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> > To decrease the suspend time, move copying the sram function to the sram
> > initialization phase, instead of every time go to suspend.
> >
> > In the meanwhile, substitute fncpy() for memcpy().
> >
> > If there is no sram allocated for PM, the PM is not supported.
>
> My board doesn't boot anymore with this change, I am not equipped enough
> to debug more, looks like fncpy() is writing the function on top of
> existing kernel code.
>
> You said you had issues with fncpy(), I guess I am having the issue you
> had.
A make clean later, it works… sorry for the mess.
Sylvain
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists