[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150315101758.GA28477@opentech.at>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 11:17:58 +0100
From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>,
Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@...to.com>,
ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: core: harmonize error case handling in
ath10k_core_start
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 03/14/2015 11:55 AM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
>
>> All of the bringup/init functions called in ath10k_core_start return 0 on
>> success and != 0 on failure - ath10k_wmi_wait_for_service_ready and
>> ath10k_wmi_wait_for_unified_ready were adjusted to fit this model and the
>> call sites here fixed up accordingly.
>
> If you've changed the sense of these function's results, you need to
> adjust the call sites in the same patch, because otherwise one wouldn't
> be able to bisect this...
>
yup both patches would mess up if individually applied or reverted.
sorry my ignorance - did not think of that problem - will fix it
up as a single patch and repost.
thx!
hofrat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists