[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150316.171243.1969465707208233939.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:12:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inet: Clean up inet_csk_wait_for_connect() vs.
might_sleep()
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:19:24 -0700
> In commit 26cabd31259ba43f68026ce3f62b78094124333f
> Peter added a sched_annotate_sleep() in sk_wait_event()
>
> Is the following patch needed as well ?
Who is asking this question and who is it directed at?
It looks like something that needs to be resolved before I apply this
patch, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists