linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] inet: Clean up inet_csk_wait_for_connect() vs. might

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1426544667.11398.231.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:24:27 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inet: Clean up inet_csk_wait_for_connect() vs.
 might_sleep()

On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 17:12 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:19:24 -0700
> 
> > In commit 26cabd31259ba43f68026ce3f62b78094124333f
> > Peter added a sched_annotate_sleep() in sk_wait_event()
> > 
> > Is the following patch needed as well ?
> 
> Who is asking this question and who is it directed at?
> 
> It looks like something that needs to be resolved before I apply this
> patch, right?

I was asking the question to Peter ;)

It's a patch that should enter one of your tree, but I would like a
comment from Peter or anyone fully understanding the issue.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/