[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150317073501.GP2896@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 08:35:01 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inet: Clean up inet_csk_wait_for_connect() vs.
might_sleep()
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:19:24PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> In commit 26cabd31259ba43f68026ce3f62b78094124333f
> Peter added a sched_annotate_sleep() in sk_wait_event()
>
> Is the following patch needed as well ?
Yes this is fine.
If we had indeed gone through the schedule and got woken we'd have had
TASK_RUNNING here, also when we retry the loop the prepare_to_wait call
will (re)set the TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> index 14d02ea905b6..3e44b9b0b78e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ static int inet_csk_wait_for_connect(struct sock *sk, long timeo)
> release_sock(sk);
> if (reqsk_queue_empty(&icsk->icsk_accept_queue))
> timeo = schedule_timeout(timeo);
> + sched_annotate_sleep();
> lock_sock(sk);
> err = 0;
> if (!reqsk_queue_empty(&icsk->icsk_accept_queue))
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists