[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150316223758.GE29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:37:58 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] XFS: allow follow_link to often succeed in
RCU-walk.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:43:20PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> - xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
> + if (rcu) {
> + if (xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED) == 0)
> + return -ECHILD;
Umm... Is that guaranteed to be safe for inode that is currently going
through xfs ->evict_inode()? struct inode getting freed is RCU-delayed;
->evict_inode() is *not*. It can happen right under you in RCU pathwalk.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists