linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] hwspinlock: qcom: Add support for Qualcomm HW Mutex block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55075B57.1000309@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 16:38:15 -0600
From:	Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
To:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
CC:	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
	Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] hwspinlock: qcom: Add support for Qualcomm HW
 Mutex block

On 2/27/2015 3:30 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Add driver for Qualcomm Hardware Mutex block found in many Qualcomm
> SoCs.
>
> Based on initial effort by Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>

I don't see any reason to hold up this patch.  We can come to a 
conclusion on the number of locks and how to handle the lock 7 special 
case as an independent follow up.

Thanks sticking with this and getting it finalized.

-- 
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/