[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrW9FRCiQdaktv+NYZE==umYu91eso3d7VV9B5VgQMD1Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:36:47 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry/32: Document our abuse of x86_hw_tss:
:ss1 and x86_hw_tss::sp1
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:09 AM, tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
<tipbot@...or.com> wrote:
> Commit-ID: f7113ffa3bcd630066119723f539db75a5721c88
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/f7113ffa3bcd630066119723f539db75a5721c88
> Author: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> AuthorDate: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:06:00 -0700
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> CommitDate: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:05:36 +0100
>
> x86/asm/entry/32: Document our abuse of x86_hw_tss::ss1 and x86_hw_tss::sp1
>
> This has confused me for a while. Now that I figured it out, document it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b7efc1b7364039824776f68e9ddee9ec1500e894.1426009661.git.luto@amacapital.net
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> index aed6d4f..c3a037b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -209,9 +209,24 @@ struct x86_hw_tss {
> unsigned short back_link, __blh;
> unsigned long sp0;
> unsigned short ss0, __ss0h;
> - unsigned long sp1;
> - /* ss1 caches MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS: */
> - unsigned short ss1, __ss1h;
> +
> + /*
> + * We don't use ring 1, so sp1 and ss1 are convenient scratch
> + * spaces in the same cacheline as sp0. We use them to cache
> + * some MSR values to avoid unnecessary wrmsr instructions.
> + *
> + * We use SYSENTER_ESP to find sp0 and for the NMI emergency
> + * stack, but we need to context switch it because we do
> + * horrible things to the kernel stack in vm86 mode.
I should have sent out my v2 sooner. Denys correctly noted that the
sp1 cache is completely useless. I'll send an incremental patch
today.
--Andy
> + *
> + * We use SYSENTER_CS to disable sysenter in vm86 mode to avoid
> + * corrupting the stack if we went through the sysenter path
> + * from vm86 mode.
> + */
> + unsigned long sp1; /* MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP */
> + unsigned short ss1; /* MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS */
> +
> + unsigned short __ss1h;
> unsigned long sp2;
> unsigned short ss2, __ss2h;
> unsigned long __cr3;
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists