lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150317171906.GQ28806@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:19:06 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
Cc:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/35 linux-next] regulator: constify of_device_id array

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 06:10:12PM +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote:

> Thanks Mark, I used a --cc-cmd script by Joe Perches with
> git send-email which uses --nom for cover-letter.

> This limits recipients to mailing lists: 37 instead of 123 in this case.
> I guess it's better to reduce the noise :)

Well, another thing to do if there's no dependencies is to just send
each patch separately - there's no real relationship between the
patches.  This also avoids the issue.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ