linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/35 linux-next] regulator: constify of_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <239561179.7761.1426613177885.open-xchange@webmail.nmp.proximus.be>
Date:	Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:26:17 +0100 (CET)
From:	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/35 linux-next] regulator: constify of_device_id array



> On 17 March 2015 at 18:19 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 06:10:12PM +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote:
>
> > Thanks Mark, I used a --cc-cmd script by Joe Perches with
> > git send-email which uses --nom for cover-letter.
>
> > This limits recipients to mailing lists: 37 instead of 123 in this case.
> > I guess it's better to reduce the noise :)
>
> Well, another thing to do if there's no dependencies is to just send
> each patch separately - there's no real relationship between the
> patches.  This also avoids the issue.

Such trivial updates are generally applied by David or Greg
after receiving some ack. That's the reason for the patchset :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/