[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55096FA1.9030908@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:29:21 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>,
Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky.perez-gonzalez@...el.com>
CC: linux-wimax@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] wimax/i2400m: fixup completion handling for resetting
a device
Hello.
On 3/17/2015 12:49 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> wait_for_completion_timeout return 0 (timeout) or >=1 (completion) so the check
> for > 0 in the else branch is always true and can be dropped. The comment seems
> misleading as it is always going to pass the result up.
> The sync of the completion access with __i2400m_dev_reset_handle (which checks
> for if (i2400m->reset_ctx) could race if i2400m_reset() returns negative so
> the resetting of i2400m->reset_ctx == NULL is moved to the out: path.
> As wait_for_completion_timeout returns unsigned long not int, an appropriately
> named variable of type unsigned long is added and assignments fixed up.
Don't try to do several things in one patch.
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
[...]
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists