linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: brcm: rationalize Broadcom documentation naming

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5509F61E.5000702@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:03:10 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
CC:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
	linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: brcm: rationalize Broadcom documentation
 naming

On 03/18/2015 03:53 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 15-03-18 12:42 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 03/18/2015 01:24 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
>>> This patchset attempts to standarize the naming of dt-bindings
>>> documents based on the Broadcom vendor prefix of brcm.
>>>
>>> Although there are no guidelines currently present for how to name
>>> the dt-bindings document the "vendor,binding.txt" style is in use by
>>> some of the other vendors.
>>
>> Conceptually I'm fine with this.
>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
>>
>> The only comment I have is that some bindings refer to other bindings,
>> e.g. an I2C controller binding might refer to the core I2C binding to
>> define core I2C properties. Since this patch moves a couple files
>> between directories, did you double-check that none of the pathnames in
>> those references need fixing up?
>
> Yes, I read all the brcm documents and did not find references to the
> moved files.

Oh, I meant references *from* the moved files to other files.

BTW, I just noticed that both your patches don't have signed-off-by lines.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/