lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:09:33 +0800 From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com> To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org> CC: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, "grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>, "graeme.gregory@...aro.org" <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>, Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>, "jcm@...hat.com" <jcm@...hat.com>, Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>, "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>, Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>, Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@...eaurora.org>, "suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deacon wrote: > Hanjun, Hi Will, > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:39:26PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> This patch set already tested on multi platforms: >> - AMD Seattle board; >> - Cavium Thunder board; >> - Huawei D02 board; >> - Qualcomm ARM64 platform >> >> This version 10 patch set address some minor comments and collect ACKs and >> Reviewed-bys for v9: >> >> - new Acks from Rafael, Olof, Grant, Lorenzo >> - new way to handle typdef phys_cpuid_t which suggested by Rafael, >> but no functional change >> - Remove if(!phys) for early ioremappings >> - Rework sleep function for ARM64 >> - Introduce linux/acpi_irq.h to hold acpi_irq_init() >> - Disable ACPI if not HW_REDUCED_ACPI compliant >> - Remove the doc of why ACPI on ARM > So I've had a look at the current state of this series and I think there > are a few immediate things left to do: > > (1) Resolve the acpi=force cmdline issue highlighted by Lorenzo and > Catalin Sure, it will be done after the confirmation with Ard. > > (2) I believe Sudeep and Lorenzo have concerns about patch 13 (SMP init), > so I'm assuming there will be additional patches from them that are > required. Sorry, I assume that it is about the print information for PSCI absent for SMP init, right? > > (3) I have an open comment about moving the IRQ domain code into the > core, which I'd like to see addressed. I replied your email, please share your ideas for what I said. > > (4) We need an ack from Daniel on the arch-timer patch OK, thanks for your ping to Daniel :) > > If you can get that in place, I'm not opposed to putting this into > linux-next ahead of the firmware summit in San Jose next week. Note that > this is not a commitment for 4.1, since I'm keen to see the outcomes of > next week before setting anything in stone. OK, I will stick to this mailing list and respond as soon as I can. > > Also, there's no need to repost patches if you're just adding Acks. I > think I'm up to speed with those on my local branch and the Tested-by > party is starting to look a little silly. Should I send another version, and add some incremental cleanup/fix patches on top of that? Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists