linux-kernel - Re: Linux Kernel Scheduling Addition Notification : Hybrid Sleepers and Unfair scheduling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:32:50 -0700
From:	Mitchell Erblich <erblichs@...thlink.net>
To:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux Kernel Scheduling Addition Notification : Hybrid Sleepers and Unfair scheduling

Group,

		As a contractor or employee, the code that I write while being employed by them is owned by the company that I work for.

		It is then up to them / legal / management, etc  whether they offer that code implementation to kernel.org or a ISP,  insert it into their release,  or whatever….

		My notification is to say here is a minimal TOI, explain additionally where necessary, that I never saw a patch offered,  it exists, and I would be willing to repeat the code with a different implementation for FREE as an individual.

			If the code is within a networking area, then maybe a simple Request For Enhancement (RFE) that explains functionality, probably some minimal API, but the direction is NOT to offer an implementation of code.

		 Thus,,,,  is just a legal statement that needs repeating each and every time that make my offer.

			How rude is that?

		  Thus, Mike ,, your statement is totally uncalled for, inappropriate… and that being behind a email address does not excuse that.

		Mitchell Erblich
		Kernel Engineer
		


On Mar 18, 2015, at 8:59 PM, Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 20:43 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote:
> 
>> This proposal was ONLY to resolve the legal issue with public domain
>> code of notification when a patch was not offered.…
> 
> Ah, so completely off topic here.. but then you knew that.  How rude.
> 
> 	-Mike
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/