[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150320170907.388d8c33@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:09:07 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 tip 3/9] tracing: attach BPF programs to kprobes
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:59:41 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote:
Some nits...
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
> +/* Copyright (c) 2011-2015 PLUMgrid, http://plumgrid.com
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public
> + * License as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <linux/filter.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include "trace.h"
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_prog_active);
> +
> +/**
> + * trace_call_bpf - invoke BPF program
> + * @prog - BPF program
> + * @ctx - opaque context pointer
> + *
> + * kprobe handlers execute BPF programs via this helper.
> + * Can be used from static tracepoints in the future.
Should also state what the expected return values are. What does a
return of "1" mean?
> + */
> +unsigned int trace_call_bpf(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *ctx)
> +{
> + unsigned int ret;
> +
> + if (in_nmi()) /* not supported yet */
> + return 1;
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> +
> + if (unlikely(__this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_prog_active) != 1)) {
> + /* since some bpf program is already running on this cpu,
You are no longer in the net/ world. The rest of the Linux coding style
is:
/*
* multi line comments
*/
Only DaveM gets away with that format ;-)
> + * don't call into another bpf program (same or different)
> + * and don't send kprobe event into ring-buffer,
> + * so return zero here
> + */
> + ret = 0;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + ret = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + out:
> + __this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active);
> + preempt_enable();
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_call_bpf);
The rest looks fine. For that..
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists