[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201503212129.18159.sergej.bauer@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 21:29:18 +0300
From: Sergej Bauer <sergej.bauer@...il.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add mkopci driver
Thanks a lot :)
But the driver is really very insignificant.
I was wondering about sysfs before, but consumers will not be very happy to get another revision of userspace tools/library.
So this is their own problems :)
Thanks again and sorry for this uselessness dialogue :)
On Saturday 21 March 2015 20:32:16 Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 21.03.2015 um 18:24 schrieb Sergej Bauer:
> > Ok, I realized uselessness of merging this driver...
>
> Please don't give up that fast!
> See: http://airlied.livejournal.com/#item80112
>
> > And you brought me to a standstill:
> >> passthrough. In either case, both the ioctl interface and the procfs interface have no future
> > But what will be after ioctl?
>
> We will not drop the ioctl() system call. But having a character device with random
> ioctl()s is not really a good driver design.
> Today we have much more elegant ways to interact between kernel and userspace than ioctl().
> For example sysfs or netlink.
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists