[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150322210315.GA974@katana>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:03:15 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Empty node & property flag accessors when !OF
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:12:23PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:13:51 -0600
> , Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
> wrote:
> > +Wolfram
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
> > <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com> wrote:
> > > Introduce empty node and property flag accessors when CONFIG_OF is not
> > > defined.
> > > This allows us to use them without ifdef'ing them in places where it
> > > makes sense to do so.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> >
> > I've asked Wolfram to apply. While not a fix itself, this is needed
> > for an I2C related fix for 3.19.
>
> I don't see this in mainline or linux-next, so I've applied to my tree.
> Thanks.
Thanks! I didn't have the original patch and asked for a resend. That
never happened, so it slipped through.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists