[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <550F2E91.7010109@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 21:05:21 +0000
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@...aro.org>
To: Naresh Bhat <naresh.bhat@...aro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
CC: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Jon Fraser <jfraser@...adcom.com>,
Parth Dixit <parth.dixit@...aro.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
"graeme.gregory@...aro.org" <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
"jcm@...hat.com" <jcm@...hat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@...eaurora.org>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
Hello,
On 21/03/2015 12:09, Naresh Bhat wrote:
> From 268dcdafa34a690e2f99c0784ca33a6d2352ecf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org <mailto:hanjun.guo@...aro.org>>
> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 14:43:54 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] XEN / ACPI: Make XEN ACPI depend on X86
>
> When ACPI is enabled on ARM64, XEN ACPI will also compiled
> into the kernel, but XEN ACPI is x86 dependent, so introduce
> CONFIG_XEN_ACPI to make it depend on x86 before XEN ACPI is
> functional on ARM64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org
> <mailto:hanjun.guo@...aro.org>>
> ---
> drivers/xen/Kconfig | 4 ++++
> drivers/xen/Makefile | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/Kconfig b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> index b812462..a31cd29 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> @@ -253,4 +253,8 @@ config XEN_EFI
> def_bool y
> depends on X86_64 && EFI
>
> +config XEN_ACPI
> + def_bool y
> + depends on X86 && ACPI
> +
> endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/Makefile b/drivers/xen/Makefile
> index 2ccd359..f4622ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/xen/Makefile
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ CFLAGS_efi.o += -fshort-wchar
>
> dom0-$(CONFIG_PCI) += pci.o
> dom0-$(CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT) += dbgp.o
> -dom0-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += acpi.o $(xen-pad-y)
> +dom0-$(CONFIG_XEN_ACPI) += acpi.o $(xen-pad-y)
> xen-pad-$(CONFIG_X86) += xen-acpi-pad.o
> dom0-$(CONFIG_X86) += pcpu.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_DOM0) += $(dom0-y)
[..]
>
> AFAIK, There is already a kernel patch exists to fix this issue. I
> think Julien or Parth is a right person to ask. Hence I am CCed Julien
> Grall too.
The ACPI support for Xen is not ready. So I think avoiding to compile
drivers/xen/acpi.c on ARM64/ARM seems the better solution for now.
Although, rather than introducing a new CONFIG option, I would use the
same trick we use within the Makefile to avoid hotplug.c on ARM/ARM64.
ifeq ($(filter y, $(CONFIG_ARM) $(CONFIG_ARM64)), )
dom0-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += acpi.o $(xen-pad-y)
endif
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists