linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 14/31] perf build: Rename PERF-FEATURES into FEATURE-DUMP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150323141300.GW16485@kernel.org>
Date:	Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:13:00 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Ahern <david.ahern@...cle.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/31] perf build: Rename PERF-FEATURES into FEATURE-DUMP

Em Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:19:33AM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> 
> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> > 
> > Preparing for feature checks separation, moving related stuff under
> > 'FEATURE*' namespace.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: David Ahern <david.ahern@...cle.com>
> > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-v9oo22ra70rrk1dy495a7bjc@git.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> 
> So I think the various capital letter files in $(cwd) are highly 
> suboptimal:
> 
>  FEATURE-DUMP
>  PERF-CFLAGS
>  PERF-VERSION-FILE
> 
> I think we should standardize on something less pushy (no shouting), 
> plus more standardized, more logical, more coherent names, i.e. 
> something like:
> 
>    .build.features.cache
>    .build.cflags
>    .build.version
> 
> ?
> 
> .build.features.* would be reserved to the generic feature detection 
> machinery.
> 
> .build.cflags and .build.version could be used by the perf build - 
> hopefully exported to tools/build/ as well in the future! :-)
> 
> That way the .gitignore could just ignore .build.* and we'd not have 
> to update it much.

Agreed, Jiri?
 
> Btw., another small nit: could we please do a (git-)rename of 
> tools/build/feature/ to tools/build/features/?

> Plural is what is used typically for generic frameworks that deal with 
> a set of items (features in this case) - for example we have 
> tools/tests/, and tools/perf/scripts/, not tools/test/ and 
> tools/perf/script/.

This one is easy enough, will do in my next pull req.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/