[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXfv8JqQD_RRLcnX9+3OGvcWO5aSjq8OTikz3qVijUA0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:27:13 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfried@...glemail.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, entry: Check for syscall exit work with IRQs disabled
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 03/23/2015 08:10 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> We currently have a race: if we're preempted during syscall exit, we
>> can fail to process syscall return work that is queued up while
>> we're preempted in ret_from_sys_call after checking ti.flags.
>>
>> Fix it by disabling interrupts before checking ti.flags.
>>
>> Fixes: 96b6352c1271 x86_64, entry: Remove the syscall exit audit and schedule optimizations
>> Reported-by: Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfried@...glemail.com>
>> Reported-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Ingo, I don't understand the LOCKDEP_SYS_EXIT stuff. Can you take a quick
>> look to confirm that it's okay to call it more than once?
>>
>> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
>> index 1d74d161687c..2babb393915e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
>> @@ -364,12 +364,21 @@ system_call_fastpath:
>> * Has incomplete stack frame and undefined top of stack.
>> */
>> ret_from_sys_call:
>> - testl $_TIF_ALLWORK_MASK,TI_flags+THREAD_INFO(%rsp,RIP-ARGOFFSET)
>> - jnz int_ret_from_sys_call_fixup /* Go the the slow path */
>> -
>> LOCKDEP_SYS_EXIT
>> DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
>> TRACE_IRQS_OFF
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We must check ti flags with interrupts (or at least preemption)
>> + * off because we must *never* return to userspace without
>> + * processing exit work that is enqueued if we're preempted here.
>> + * In particular, returning to userspace with any of the one-shot
>> + * flags (TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY, etc) set is
>> + * very bad.
>> + */
>> + testl $_TIF_ALLWORK_MASK,TI_flags+THREAD_INFO(%rsp,RIP-ARGOFFSET)
>> + jnz int_ret_from_sys_call_fixup /* Go the the slow path */
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> typo here; s/the the/to the/
Whoops.
>
>
>> +
>> CFI_REMEMBER_STATE
>> /*
>> * sysretq will re-enable interrupts:
>> @@ -386,7 +395,7 @@ ret_from_sys_call:
>>
>> int_ret_from_sys_call_fixup:
>> FIXUP_TOP_OF_STACK %r11, -ARGOFFSET
>> - jmp int_ret_from_sys_call
>> + jmp int_ret_from_sys_call_irqs_off
>>
>> /* Do syscall tracing */
>> tracesys:
>> @@ -432,6 +441,7 @@ tracesys_phase2:
>> GLOBAL(int_ret_from_sys_call)
>> DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
>> TRACE_IRQS_OFF
>> +int_ret_from_sys_call_irqs_off:
>> movl $_TIF_ALLWORK_MASK,%edi
>> /* edi: mask to check */
>> GLOBAL(int_with_check)
>
>
> You can avoid having to know LOCKDEP_SYS_EXIT :)
> Just set %edi = $_TIF_ALLWORK_MASK, and jump a bit farther:
>
>
> movl $_TIF_ALLWORK_MASK,%edi
> testl %edi,TI_flags+THREAD_INFO(%rsp,RIP-ARGOFFSET)
> jnz int_ret_from_sys_call_fixup /* Go to the slow path */
> ...
> ...
> GLOBAL(int_ret_from_sys_call)
> DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
> TRACE_IRQS_OFF
> movl $_TIF_ALLWORK_MASK,%edi
> /* edi: mask to check */
> GLOBAL(int_with_check)
> LOCKDEP_SYS_EXIT_IRQ
> int_ret_from_sys_call_irqs_off: <========== HERE
>
I didn't want to do that, because I really want to rewrite
int_ret_from_sys_call in C.
--Andy
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists