[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <178407860.0zoJnDfCo1@tacticalops>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 22:08:24 +0100
From: Martin Walch <walch.martin@....de>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: drop bogus default values
On Thursday 12 March 2015 13:11:47 Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 13:59 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > Default "no" is pretty pointless for options without (visible) prompts:
>
> Related: is there ever a situation where using "default n" or "def_bool
> n" makes sense (whether or not the entry has a prompt)? I think I once
> thought of one but I can't remember it at all, so I guess my memory is
> fooling me.
Your memory is right. It is rarely used, but there is an application for
using a plain "default n": to overwrite an existing other default value.
Particularly in one special case this is desired: Let us say there is a
symbol that may lack a visible prompt, but has the default value y set in
a Kconfig file that is used across all architectures. If there is a single
architecture that must have the default value n then it is possible to
override the default y in the global file with a default n in the
architecture specific file.
A real world case is PCI_QUIRKS in the mainline kernel:
init/Kconfig:1554: default y
arch/s390/Kconfig:59: def_bool n
When setting PCI!=n && EXPERT=n then on each architecture PCI_QUIRKS=y
except on s390 where PCI_QUIRKS=n.
Regards,
Martin Walch
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists