[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150323210918.GS14954@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:09:18 -0700
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] eeprom: Add a simple EEPROM framework for eeprom
providers
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 09:50:14AM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
A couple of *very* minor points below, otherwise this looks OK to me.
> +struct eeprom_device *eeprom_register(struct eeprom_config *config)
> +{
> + struct eeprom_device *eeprom;
> + int rval;
> +
> + if (!config->regmap || !config->size) {
> + dev_err(config->dev, "Regmap not found\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
You have a struct device in the config and the regmap API has
dev_get_regmap() which for most devices that don't have multiple regmaps
will give the right regmap. It would be nice to support this as a
convenience for users.
> + eeprom = kzalloc(sizeof(*eeprom), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!eeprom)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
...
> + rval = device_add(&eeprom->dev);
> + if (rval)
> + return ERR_PTR(rval);
Don't you need a kfree() if device_add() fails?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists