| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <55113D1B.1030906@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:31:55 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
CC: GTA04 owners <gta04-owner@...delico.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] TTY: add support for tty_slave devices.
Hi,
On 03/18/2015, 06:58 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/tty/slave/tty_slave_core.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
...
> +static int tty_slave_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> +{
> + return of_driver_match_device(dev, drv);
> +}
> +
> +static void tty_slave_release(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + kfree(dev);
This should free the slave where the dev is contained. This is never
called IMO due to missing put_device's in the code.
> +}
> +
> +struct bus_type tty_slave_bus_type = {
> + .name = "tty-slave",
> + .match = tty_slave_match,
> +};
> +
> +int tty_slave_register(struct device *parent, struct device_node *node,
> + struct device *tty, struct tty_driver *drv)
> +{
> + struct tty_slave *slave;
> + int retval;
> +
> + if (!of_get_property(node, "compatible", NULL))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + slave = kzalloc(sizeof(*slave), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!slave)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
device_initialize();
> + slave->dev.bus = &tty_slave_bus_type;
> + slave->dev.parent = parent;
> + slave->dev.release = tty_slave_release;
> + slave->dev.of_node = of_node_get(node);
> + dev_set_name(&slave->dev, "%s", node->name);
> + slave->tty_dev = tty;
> + slave->tty_drv = drv;
> + slave->ops = *drv->ops;
> + retval = device_register(&slave->dev);
> + if (retval) {
> + of_node_put(node);
> + kfree(slave);
Do device_put() instead of the two. And do the two in .release.
> + }
> + return retval;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tty_slave_register);
...
> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
...
> @@ -3205,6 +3208,29 @@ static void tty_device_create_release(struct device *dev)
> kfree(dev);
> }
>
> +int tty_register_finalize(struct tty_driver *driver, struct device *dev)
> +{
> + int retval;
> + bool cdev = false;
> + int index = dev->devt - MKDEV(driver->major,
> + driver->minor_start);
> + printk("REGISTER %d %d 0x%x %d\n", driver->major, driver->minor_start, dev->devt, index);
> + if (!(driver->flags & TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_ALLOC)) {
> + retval = tty_cdev_add(driver,
> + dev->devt,
> + index, 1);
> + if (retval)
> + return retval;
> + cdev = true;
> + }
> + retval = device_register(dev);
> + if (retval == 0)
> + return 0;
> + if (cdev)
> + cdev_del(&driver->cdevs[index]);
> + return retval;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tty_register_finalize);
> /**
> * tty_register_device_attr - register a tty device
> * @driver: the tty driver that describes the tty device
> @@ -3234,7 +3260,8 @@ struct device *tty_register_device_attr(struct tty_driver *driver,
> dev_t devt = MKDEV(driver->major, driver->minor_start) + index;
> struct device *dev = NULL;
> int retval = -ENODEV;
> - bool cdev = false;
> + struct device_node *node;
> + bool slave_registered = false;
>
> if (index >= driver->num) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "Attempt to register invalid tty line number "
> @@ -3247,13 +3274,6 @@ struct device *tty_register_device_attr(struct tty_driver *driver,
> else
> tty_line_name(driver, index, name);
>
> - if (!(driver->flags & TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_ALLOC)) {
> - retval = tty_cdev_add(driver, devt, index, 1);
> - if (retval)
> - goto error;
> - cdev = true;
> - }
> -
> dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!dev) {
> retval = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -3268,16 +3288,24 @@ struct device *tty_register_device_attr(struct tty_driver *driver,
> dev->groups = attr_grp;
> dev_set_drvdata(dev, drvdata);
>
> - retval = device_register(dev);
> - if (retval)
> - goto error;
> + if (device && device->of_node)
> + for_each_available_child_of_node(device->of_node, node) {
> + if (tty_slave_register(device, node, dev, driver) == 0)
> + slave_registered = true;
> + if (slave_registered)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (!slave_registered) {
> + retval = tty_register_finalize(driver, dev);
> + if (retval)
> + goto error;
> + }
>
> return dev;
And what about ttys not using the tty_register_device* helpers?
What happens when the tty is unregistered?
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/tty_slave.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +
> +struct tty_slave {
> + struct device *tty_dev;
> + struct tty_driver *tty_drv;
> + struct tty_operations ops;
> + struct device dev;
> +};
> +
> +int tty_slave_finalize(struct tty_slave *slave);
> +int tty_slave_driver_register(struct device_driver *drv);
> +#if config_enabled(CONFIG_TTY_SLAVE)
Since TTY_SLAVE is tristate, this will work only for TTY_SLAVE == y, not
m. Use IS_ENABLED instead.
> +void tty_slave_activate(struct tty_struct *tty);
> +int tty_slave_register(struct device *parent, struct device_node *node,
> + struct device *tty, struct tty_driver *drv);
> +#else
> +static inline void tty_slave_activate(struct tty_struct *tty)
> +{
> +}
> +static inline int tty_slave_register(struct device *parent,
> + struct device_node *node,
> + struct device *tty,
> + struct tty_driver *drv)
> +{
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +#endif
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists