linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] block: loop: switch to VFS ITER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150324103219.GD7002@lst.de>
Date:	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:32:19 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] block: loop: switch to VFS ITER_BVEC

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:14:51PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> This patchset uses VFS ITER_BVEC for reading/writing
> loop backing file, and basically it is a rewriting of
> Christoph Hellwig's post in [1].

What is the benefit over my older version?  From all I can see the
code is a lot more complicated without any obvious benefit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/