[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVMcC4G5s0-JT1Z8APup18MKwGAkN7qyubxDW-ByTVxtRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:49:00 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: loop: use kmap(page) instead of page_address(page)
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:14:52PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> The raw page allocated in lo_send() can be a highmem page,
>> so kmap(page) should be used for read/write on the page.
>>
>> Also the patch removes kmap()/kunmap() in lo_send() because
>> it isn't needed at all.
>
> The description seems odd, what it seems to do is to shift the
> kmap from lo_send into do_lo_send_write. This does not seem
Looks I ignore the fact which kmap() can setup page_address(),
so this change isn't needed, please ignore the patch.
> very useful as it now means a kmap per segment instead of just
> a single one per I/O. What would make more sense is to just
> not allocate a highmem page.
On 32bit system, this still may cause pressure on page allocation, since
requests are handled concurrently now after using workqueue.
But it is a good idea to keep kmap() per segment, and will do that in v2.
Thanks,
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists