[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150324104003.GA28721@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:40:03 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: sm7xxfb: start using module parameters
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 03:58:35PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:48:26AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:20:08AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > + "\t\t0x31B = 1280x1024-24\n"
> > > + "\t\tUsual example:\n"
> > > + "\t\tinsmod ./sm7xxfb.ko mode_option=\"0x301\"\n");
> > > +
> >
> > That's funny :)
> >
> > And how do you handle multiple devices in the system?
> frankly speaking, never got the idea about multiple devices.
>
> >
> > :(
> >
> > Seriously, never use module parameters for device parameters, they are
> > two different things. The framebuffer core has options for handling
> > modes, why not use them?
> >
> > And yes, lots of framebuffer drivers do have crazy module parameters,
> > but that doesn't mean you have to perpetuate the insanity, please do
> > things properly here.
> i am learning from other framebuffer drivers. i guess i should only
> see at skeletonfb.c and not the others.
> please drop this 1/2 patch, do i need to resend the 2/2 which adds
> the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE ?
Please do, it's long gone from my queue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists