[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150324103834.GF18115@ulmo.nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:38:35 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Mikko Perttunen <mikko.perttunen@...si.fi>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] clk: tegra: Have EMC clock implement
determine_rate()
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:36:13AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> instead of round_rate, so we can take rate constraints into account when
> choosing the best rate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Mike, Stephen,
I'd like to take this into the Tegra tree because other patches depend
on this (albeit as far as I can tell it's only a runtime dependency).
This patch also depends on the EMC frequency scaling patches (that Mike
Acked) that I have in a separate branch. Alternatively I can provide a
stable branch with my current stash of patches that you can pull into
the clk tree.
Thanks,
Thierry
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c
> index 704fff7..615da43 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c
> @@ -117,8 +117,11 @@ static unsigned long emc_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> * safer since things have EMC rate floors. Also don't touch parent_rate
> * since we don't want the CCF to play with our parent clocks.
> */
> -static long emc_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> - unsigned long *parent_rate)
> +static long emc_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long min_rate,
> + unsigned long max_rate,
> + unsigned long *best_parent_rate,
> + struct clk_hw **best_parent_hw)
> {
> struct tegra_clk_emc *tegra;
> u8 ram_code = tegra_read_ram_code();
> @@ -133,7 +136,15 @@ static long emc_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>
> timing = tegra->timings + i;
>
> - if (timing->rate >= rate)
> + if (timing->rate > max_rate) {
> + i = min(i, 1);
> + return tegra->timings[i - 1].rate;
> + }
> +
> + if (timing->rate < min_rate)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (timing->rate >= rate)
> return timing->rate;
> }
>
> @@ -452,7 +463,7 @@ static int load_timings_from_dt(struct tegra_clk_emc *tegra,
>
> static const struct clk_ops tegra_clk_emc_ops = {
> .recalc_rate = emc_recalc_rate,
> - .round_rate = emc_round_rate,
> + .determine_rate = emc_determine_rate,
> .set_rate = emc_set_rate,
> .get_parent = emc_get_parent,
> };
> --
> 2.1.0
>
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists