[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150324104339.GG18115@ulmo.nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:43:41 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"kbuild-all@...org" <kbuild-all@...org>,
"linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:38:18AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 09:06:14AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> >> drivers/pwm/pwm-stmpe.c:99:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
> >>
> >> Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
> >>
> >> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> pwm-stmpe.c | 1 -
> >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Erm... this driver doesn't exist in my tree. What's going on?
>
> What's going on is that the 0day build robot builds everything it
> finds, including experimental branches.
>
> I dunno why it's mailing you though, probably I already added your
> CC on the patch... stupid me. A bit much to think of.
I guess the robot generates this patch and then runs get_maintainers.pl
on it, so it's doing the right thing. Anyway, I'll know to ignore these
in the future if drivers aren't in my tree yet.
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists