linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] kprobes: Disable Kprobe when ftrace arming fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150324093638.633b115f@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:36:38 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
Cc:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
	Ananth NMavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kprobes: Disable Kprobe when ftrace arming fails

On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:59:25 +0100
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz> wrote:


> I used the term to answer the question about interference between
> Jprobes, ftrace, and live patches. I am sorry again. I should have
> described it in a broader context.

Don't be sorry. It wasn't a big deal ;-)

> 
> 
> Anyway, please, let me to repeat. This patch makes sense even without
> live patching. The ftrace operations were there even before and might
> have failed.

I'll have to take a deeper look at the patch again. I'll give it a
review.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/