[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150327055523.GC5625@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:55:23 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Cc: Mathieu Olivari <mathieu@...eaurora.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, corbet@....net, standby24x7@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] arm: msm: Use timer DT node for qcom watchdog config
On 02/20, Mathieu Olivari wrote:
> This change is done as a follow-up to the following thread:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/1/436
>
> qcom-wdt is currently assuming the presence of a dedicated node in DT
> to gets its configuration. However, on msm architecture, the watchdog is
> usually part of the timer block. So this patch-set is changing the driver
> and slightly enhancing the timer DT bindings to provide the relevant clocks
> and interrupts.
>
> Mathieu Olivari (3):
> watchdog: qcom: use timer devicetree binding
> ARM: qcom: add description of KPSS WDT for IPQ8064
> ARM: msm: add watchdog entries to DT timer binding doc
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/timer.txt | 16 +++++++++++++---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi | 14 +++++++++++++-
> drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
Can this patchset be applied? Or should we resend with collected
acks?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists