linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/asm/entry/32: Use PUSH instructions to build pt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55154868.2030103@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:09:12 +0100
From:	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/asm/entry/32: Use PUSH instructions to build
 pt_regs on stack

On 03/27/2015 12:32 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
>> This mimics the recent similar 64-bit change.
>> Saves ~110 bytes of code.
> 
> Would be nice to know whether you tested all the affected system entry 
> variants, on both AMD and Intel CPUs?

Yes, I did. I also looked at the diff of entry_64.o disassembly, to have
a different view of the changes.

I know how fragile this stuff is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/