lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:49:41 -0600 From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com> To: Yun Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com> Cc: "ira.weiny" <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>, Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>, Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>, "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>, Moni Shoua <monis@...lanox.com>, PJ Waskiewicz <pj.waskiewicz@...idfire.com>, Tatyana Nikolova <Tatyana.E.Nikolova@...el.com>, Yan Burman <yanb@...lanox.com>, Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>, Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>, Majd Dibbiny <majd@...lanox.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>, Alex Estrin <alex.estrin@...el.com>, Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Erez Shitrit <erezsh@...lanox.com>, Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>, Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>, Shachar Raindel <raindel@...lanox.com>, Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>, Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>, Tom Tucker <tom@....us>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/11] IB/Verbs: Use management helper has_mcast() and, cap_mcast() for mcast-check On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 06:31:26PM +0100, Yun Wang wrote: > Maybe we can temporarily reserve the old logical, and gradually solve > these problems? It is best to make behavioral changes in small patches, yes. I think it is best to address these sorts of problems before trying to tackle the driver interface side - that will avoid complexity. ie how does a driver set has_ipoib? It isn't even a sensible question when it is a per port capability. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists