[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJuTgQUKMYOE7XBxUPG=amYi1zSJ-7FVk92uf4pVbGimtymXMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:09:27 +0100
From: Yun Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc: "ira.weiny" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Moni Shoua <monis@...lanox.com>,
PJ Waskiewicz <pj.waskiewicz@...idfire.com>,
Tatyana Nikolova <Tatyana.E.Nikolova@...el.com>,
Yan Burman <yanb@...lanox.com>,
Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Majd Dibbiny <majd@...lanox.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
Alex Estrin <alex.estrin@...el.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Erez Shitrit <erezsh@...lanox.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
Shachar Raindel <raindel@...lanox.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Tom Tucker <tom@....us>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/11] IB/Verbs: Use management helper has_mcast()
and, cap_mcast() for mcast-check
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 06:31:26PM +0100, Yun Wang wrote:
>
>> Maybe we can temporarily reserve the old logical, and gradually solve
>> these problems?
>
> It is best to make behavioral changes in small patches, yes.
>
> I think it is best to address these sorts of problems before trying to
> tackle the driver interface side - that will avoid complexity.
>
> ie how does a driver set has_ipoib? It isn't even a sensible question
> when it is a per port capability.
I used to imaging it would like:
init_device_mgmt_attributs(device)
{
for_each_port(device)
if (port support XX) {
port.mgmt_attribute |= CAP_XX
if !(device.mgmt_attribute & HAS_XX)
device.mgmt_attribute |= HAS_XX
}
}
That is incase if a device got one port have some capability, the
device have it too, so has_XX() will check on device level that if it
has any port support XX, and cap_XX() to check on port level.
But if has_XX() is only for optimizing the init/exit path, then it
doesn't make sense to me any more...
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists