linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: ENOMEM bugfixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Mar 2015 14:06:49 -0700
From:	Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
To:	dsterba@...e.cz, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
	Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: ENOMEM bugfixes

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:43:42PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:04:30PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 09:40:17PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > > Ping. For anyone following along, it looks like commit cc87317726f8
> > > ("mm: page_alloc: revert inadvertent !__GFP_FS retry behavior change")
> > > reverted the commit that exposed these bugs. Josef said he was okay with
> > > taking these, will they make it to an upcoming -rc soon?
> > 
> > Upcoming yes, but based on my experience with pushing patches that are
> > not really regressions in late rc's it's unlikely for 4.1.
> 
> Ok, seeing as these bugs are going to be really hard to trigger now that
> the old GFP_FS behavior has been restored, I'm fine with waiting for the
> next merge window.
> 
> Thank you!

Chris, would you mind taking these for a spin in your integration branch
for the next merge window?

Thanks,
-- 
Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/