[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150413213217.GA4857@mew.cs.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:32:17 -0700
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
To: dsterba@...e.cz, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: ENOMEM bugfixes
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:06:49PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:43:42PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:04:30PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 09:40:17PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > > > Ping. For anyone following along, it looks like commit cc87317726f8
> > > > ("mm: page_alloc: revert inadvertent !__GFP_FS retry behavior change")
> > > > reverted the commit that exposed these bugs. Josef said he was okay with
> > > > taking these, will they make it to an upcoming -rc soon?
> > >
> > > Upcoming yes, but based on my experience with pushing patches that are
> > > not really regressions in late rc's it's unlikely for 4.1.
> >
> > Ok, seeing as these bugs are going to be really hard to trigger now that
> > the old GFP_FS behavior has been restored, I'm fine with waiting for the
> > next merge window.
> >
> > Thank you!
>
> Chris, would you mind taking these for a spin in your integration branch
> for the next merge window?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Omar
Ping.
--
Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists