[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150330092410.24979.59887.stgit@preeti.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:59:19 +0530
From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, tglx@...utronix.de,
rjw@...ysocki.net, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: nicolas.pitre@...aro.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V2] clockevents: Fix cpu down race for hrtimer based
broadcasting
It was found when doing a hotplug stress test on POWER, that the machine
either hit softlockups or rcu_sched stall warnings. The issue was
traced to commit 7cba160ad789a powernv/cpuidle: Redesign idle states
management, which exposed the cpu down race with hrtimer based broadcast
mode(Commit 5d1638acb9f6(tick: Introduce hrtimer based broadcast). This
is explained below.
Assume CPU1 is the CPU which holds the hrtimer broadcasting duty before
it is taken down.
CPU0 CPU1
cpu_down() take_cpu_down()
disable_interrupts()
cpu_die()
while(CPU1 != CPU_DEAD) {
msleep(100);
switch_to_idle();
stop_cpu_timer();
schedule_broadcast();
}
tick_cleanup_cpu_dead()
take_over_broadcast()
So after CPU1 disabled interrupts it cannot handle the broadcast hrtimer
anymore, so CPU0 will be stuck forever.
Fix this by explicitly taking over broadcast duty before cpu_die().
This is a temporary workaround. What we really want is a callback in the
clockevent device which allows us to do that from the dying CPU by
pushing the hrtimer onto a different cpu. That might involve an IPI and
is definitely more complex than this immediate fix.
Fixes:
http://linuxppc.10917.n7.nabble.com/offlining-cpus-breakage-td88619.html
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Preeti U. Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Changelog drawn from: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/16/213]
---
Change from V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/26/11
1. Decoupled this fix from the kernel/time cleanup patches. V1 had a fail
related to the cleanup which needs to be fixed. But since this bug fix
is independent of this and needs to go in quickly, the patch is being posted
out separately to be merged.
include/linux/tick.h | 10 +++++++---
kernel/cpu.c | 2 ++
kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
index 9c085dc..3069256 100644
--- a/include/linux/tick.h
+++ b/include/linux/tick.h
@@ -94,14 +94,18 @@ extern void tick_cancel_sched_timer(int cpu);
static inline void tick_cancel_sched_timer(int cpu) { }
# endif
-# ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
+# if defined CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
extern struct tick_device *tick_get_broadcast_device(void);
extern struct cpumask *tick_get_broadcast_mask(void);
-# ifdef CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT
+# if defined CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT
extern struct cpumask *tick_get_broadcast_oneshot_mask(void);
+extern void tick_takeover(int deadcpu);
+# else
+static inline void tick_takeover(int deadcpu) {}
# endif
-
+# else
+static inline void tick_takeover(int deadcpu) {}
# endif /* BROADCAST */
# ifdef CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 1972b16..f9ca351 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <linux/gfp.h>
#include <linux/suspend.h>
#include <linux/lockdep.h>
+#include <linux/tick.h>
#include <trace/events/power.h>
#include "smpboot.h"
@@ -411,6 +412,7 @@ static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen)
while (!idle_cpu(cpu))
cpu_relax();
+ tick_takeover(cpu);
/* This actually kills the CPU. */
__cpu_die(cpu);
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
index 066f0ec..0fd6634 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
@@ -669,14 +669,19 @@ static void broadcast_shutdown_local(struct clock_event_device *bc,
clockevents_set_mode(dev, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN);
}
-static void broadcast_move_bc(int deadcpu)
+void tick_takeover(int deadcpu)
{
- struct clock_event_device *bc = tick_broadcast_device.evtdev;
+ struct clock_event_device *bc;
+ unsigned long flags;
- if (!bc || !broadcast_needs_cpu(bc, deadcpu))
- return;
- /* This moves the broadcast assignment to this cpu */
- clockevents_program_event(bc, bc->next_event, 1);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tick_broadcast_lock, flags);
+ bc = tick_broadcast_device.evtdev;
+
+ if (bc && broadcast_needs_cpu(bc, deadcpu)) {
+ /* This moves the broadcast assignment to this cpu */
+ clockevents_program_event(bc, bc->next_event, 1);
+ }
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tick_broadcast_lock, flags);
}
/*
@@ -913,8 +918,6 @@ void tick_shutdown_broadcast_oneshot(unsigned int *cpup)
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, tick_broadcast_pending_mask);
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, tick_broadcast_force_mask);
- broadcast_move_bc(cpu);
-
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tick_broadcast_lock, flags);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists