[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1503301930590.25806@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:11:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: peterz@...radead.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, tglx@...utronix.de,
rjw@...ysocki.net, mingo@...nel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] clockevents: Fix cpu down race for hrtimer based
broadcasting
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> It was found when doing a hotplug stress test on POWER, that the machine
> either hit softlockups or rcu_sched stall warnings. The issue was
> traced to commit 7cba160ad789a powernv/cpuidle: Redesign idle states
> management, which exposed the cpu down race with hrtimer based broadcast
> mode(Commit 5d1638acb9f6(tick: Introduce hrtimer based broadcast). This
> is explained below.
>
> Assume CPU1 is the CPU which holds the hrtimer broadcasting duty before
> it is taken down.
>
> CPU0 CPU1
>
> cpu_down() take_cpu_down()
> disable_interrupts()
>
> cpu_die()
>
> while(CPU1 != CPU_DEAD) {
> msleep(100);
> switch_to_idle();
> stop_cpu_timer();
> schedule_broadcast();
> }
>
> tick_cleanup_cpu_dead()
> take_over_broadcast()
>
> So after CPU1 disabled interrupts it cannot handle the broadcast hrtimer
> anymore, so CPU0 will be stuck forever.
>
> Fix this by explicitly taking over broadcast duty before cpu_die().
> This is a temporary workaround. What we really want is a callback in the
> clockevent device which allows us to do that from the dying CPU by
> pushing the hrtimer onto a different cpu. That might involve an IPI and
> is definitely more complex than this immediate fix.
>
> Fixes:
> http://linuxppc.10917.n7.nabble.com/offlining-cpus-breakage-td88619.html
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Preeti U. Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> [Changelog drawn from: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/16/213]
The lock-up I was experiencing with v1 of this patch is no longer
reproducible with this one.
Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
> ---
> Change from V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/26/11
> 1. Decoupled this fix from the kernel/time cleanup patches. V1 had a fail
> related to the cleanup which needs to be fixed. But since this bug fix
> is independent of this and needs to go in quickly, the patch is being posted
> out separately to be merged.
>
> include/linux/tick.h | 10 +++++++---
> kernel/cpu.c | 2 ++
> kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
> index 9c085dc..3069256 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tick.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
> @@ -94,14 +94,18 @@ extern void tick_cancel_sched_timer(int cpu);
> static inline void tick_cancel_sched_timer(int cpu) { }
> # endif
>
> -# ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
> +# if defined CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
> extern struct tick_device *tick_get_broadcast_device(void);
> extern struct cpumask *tick_get_broadcast_mask(void);
>
> -# ifdef CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT
> +# if defined CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT
> extern struct cpumask *tick_get_broadcast_oneshot_mask(void);
> +extern void tick_takeover(int deadcpu);
> +# else
> +static inline void tick_takeover(int deadcpu) {}
> # endif
> -
> +# else
> +static inline void tick_takeover(int deadcpu) {}
> # endif /* BROADCAST */
>
> # ifdef CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 1972b16..f9ca351 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> #include <linux/suspend.h>
> #include <linux/lockdep.h>
> +#include <linux/tick.h>
> #include <trace/events/power.h>
>
> #include "smpboot.h"
> @@ -411,6 +412,7 @@ static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen)
> while (!idle_cpu(cpu))
> cpu_relax();
>
> + tick_takeover(cpu);
> /* This actually kills the CPU. */
> __cpu_die(cpu);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> index 066f0ec..0fd6634 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> @@ -669,14 +669,19 @@ static void broadcast_shutdown_local(struct clock_event_device *bc,
> clockevents_set_mode(dev, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN);
> }
>
> -static void broadcast_move_bc(int deadcpu)
> +void tick_takeover(int deadcpu)
> {
> - struct clock_event_device *bc = tick_broadcast_device.evtdev;
> + struct clock_event_device *bc;
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> - if (!bc || !broadcast_needs_cpu(bc, deadcpu))
> - return;
> - /* This moves the broadcast assignment to this cpu */
> - clockevents_program_event(bc, bc->next_event, 1);
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tick_broadcast_lock, flags);
> + bc = tick_broadcast_device.evtdev;
> +
> + if (bc && broadcast_needs_cpu(bc, deadcpu)) {
> + /* This moves the broadcast assignment to this cpu */
> + clockevents_program_event(bc, bc->next_event, 1);
> + }
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tick_broadcast_lock, flags);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -913,8 +918,6 @@ void tick_shutdown_broadcast_oneshot(unsigned int *cpup)
> cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, tick_broadcast_pending_mask);
> cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, tick_broadcast_force_mask);
>
> - broadcast_move_bc(cpu);
> -
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tick_broadcast_lock, flags);
> }
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists