[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150330140256.GM24151@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:02:56 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, acme@...radead.org,
eranian@...gle.com, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/6] perf, x86: use the PEBS auto reload mechanism
when possible
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 02:06:07PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:25:51AM -0500, Kan Liang wrote:
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
> > @@ -673,6 +673,8 @@ void intel_pmu_pebs_enable(struct perf_event *event)
> > struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> >
> > hwc->config &= ~ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INT;
> > + if (!event->attr.freq)
> > + hwc->flags |= PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD;
> >
> > cpuc->pebs_enabled |= 1ULL << hwc->idx;
>
> Why not in x86_pmu_event_init()? This is not something that will change,
> ever, right?
intel_pmu_hw_config() would be the better place, as said in a later
email.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists