linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V5 4/6] perf, x86: handle multiple records in PEBS buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0770178BAF5@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:19:50 +0000
From:	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"acme@...radead.org" <acme@...radead.org>,
	"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
	"andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V5 4/6] perf, x86: handle multiple records in PEBS buffer



> > One corner case needs to mention is that the PEBS hardware doesn't
> > deal well with collisions, when PEBS events happen near to each other.
> > The records for the events can be collapsed into a single one, and
> > it's not possible to reconstruct all events that caused the PEBS
> > record, However in practice collisions are extremely rare, as long as
> > different events are used. The periods are typically very large, so
> > any collision is unlikely. When collision happens, we drop the PEBS
> > record.
> >
> > Here are some numbers about collisions.
> > Four frequently occurring events
> > (cycles:p,instructions:p,branches:p,mem-stores:p) are tested
> >
> > Test events which are sampled together                   collision rate
> > cycles:p,instructions:p                                  0.25%
> > cycles:p,instructions:p,branches:p                       0.30%
> > cycles:p,instructions:p,branches:p,mem-stores:p          0.35%
> >
> > cycles:p,cycles:p                                        98.52%
> >
> > collisions are extremely rare as long as different events are used.
> > The only way you can get a lot of collision is when you count the same
> > thing multiple times. But it is not a useful configuration.
> 
> This fails to mention the other problem the status field has.  You also did
> not specify what exact condition you counted as a collision.
> 
> The PEBS status field is a copy of the GLOBAL_STATUS MSR at assist time,
> this means that:
> 
>  - its possible (and harmless) for the status field to contain set bits
>    for !PEBS events -- the proposed code is buggy here.
I will fix it.
>  - its possible to have multiple PEBS bits set even though the event
>    really only was for a single event -- if you count everything with
>    multiple PEBS bits set as a collision you're counting wrong.
> 

In what situation multiple PEBS bits was set for a single event?
Could you please give me an example?

Thanks,
Kan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/