[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150330172545.GG2366@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:25:45 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"acme@...radead.org" <acme@...radead.org>,
"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
"andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/6] perf, x86: handle multiple records in PEBS buffer
> > - its possible (and harmless) for the status field to contain set bits
> > for !PEBS events -- the proposed code is buggy here.
> I will fix it.
> > - its possible to have multiple PEBS bits set even though the event
> > really only was for a single event -- if you count everything with
> > multiple PEBS bits set as a collision you're counting wrong.
> >
>
> In what situation multiple PEBS bits was set for a single event?
> Could you please give me an example?
The field in the PEBS record is just a copy of GLOBAL_STATUS (minus
some extra bits), so if there were already bits in GLOBAL_STATUS
that haven't been cleared yet you may see multiple bits
In a proper configuration this should be rare, as we expect the
events to be different and run on different effective frequencies,
so GLOBAL_STATUS should be already cleared.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists