linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] nohz: add tick_nohz_full_clear

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:45:41 -0400
From:	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] nohz: add tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus() API

On 03/30/2015 12:41 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 03/30/2015 12:20 PM, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> I wanted to ping the patch below again, since I haven't heard any
>> feedback.
>>
>> I note that Rik van Riel's change posted this weekend offers similar
>> functionality for userspace.  My change offers a convenient API
>> for, e.g., kernel drivers setting up default irq balancing.
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/28/94
> I submitted a patch to irqbalance to exclude nohz_full
> cpus from having irqs assigned to them.  I could see
> the same thing being useful for in-kernel irq assignment,
> especially for multi-queue devices that set up irqs on
> multiple CPUs.
>
>> An alternate API would be one that just returned the full no_hz
>> cpumask to kernel callers; I'd be happy with that as well, but my
>> instinct was to make the API as narrow as possible to start with.
>>
>> Comments?
> What drivers and subsystems are you targeting?

At the moment, just the on-chip tilegx ethernet controller
(drivers/net/ethernet/tile/tilegx.c) but I'm pushing to upstream
a number of other commits from the Tilera "dataplane" mode,
some of which include code that acts on cpumasks as well.

> I am just looking at blk-mq now, and it seems like the
> API most appropriate for that would be an inline function
> that tests whether or not a CPU is nohz_full.

That API already exists - tick_nohz_full_cpu().

> for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
>
> 	...
>
> 	if (cpu_nohz_full(i))
> 		continue;
>
> }
>
> A lot of the other code in drivers and subsystems that
> set up per-cpu queues and irqs seem to iterate over all
> CPUs at init time, and could benefit from a function
> allowing them to skip nohz_full CPUs.
>
> Your tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus() function seems reasonable
> too, for code that uses a cpumask to set up per cpu stuff.

I'm happy to ask for a pull request for the tile architecture
that includes that commit, if no one objects.  I'd be happier
if someone acked the patch more explicitly, though.

Thanks!

> From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
>
> This is useful, for example, to modify a cpumask to avoid the
> nohz cores so that interrupts aren't sent to them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
> ---
> Motivated by patch 4/4 in this series.
>
>    include/linux/tick.h | 7 +++++++
>    1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
> index 9c085dc12ae9..d53ad4892a39 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tick.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
> @@ -186,6 +186,12 @@ static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu)
>        return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tick_nohz_full_mask);
>    }
>    +static inline void tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus(struct cpumask *mask)
> +{
> +    if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
> +        cpumask_andnot(mask, mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
> +}
> +
>    extern void __tick_nohz_full_check(void);
>    extern void tick_nohz_full_kick(void);
>    extern void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu);
> @@ -194,6 +200,7 @@ extern void __tick_nohz_task_switch(struct
> task_struct *tsk);
>    #else
>    static inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void) { return false; }
>    static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu) { return false; }
> +static inline void tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus(struct cpumask *mask) { }
>    static inline void __tick_nohz_full_check(void) { }
>    static inline void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu) { }
>    static inline void tick_nohz_full_kick(void) { }

-- 
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/