[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <551A861B.7020701@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:33:47 +0300
From: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [patch v2 4/4] mm, mempool: poison elements backed by page
allocator
On 03/27/2015 01:50 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> We don't have a need to set PAGE_EXT_DEBUG_POISON on these pages sitting
> in the reserved pool, nor do we have a need to do kmap_atomic() since it's
> already mapped and must be mapped to be on the reserved pool, which is
> handled by mempool_free().
>
Hmm.. I just realized that this statement might be wrong.
Why pages has to be mapped to be on reserved pool?
mempool could be used for highmem pages and there is no need to kmap()
until these pages will be used.
drbd (drivers/block/drbd) already uses mempool for highmem pages:
static int drbd_create_mempools(void)
{
....
drbd_md_io_page_pool = mempool_create_page_pool(DRBD_MIN_POOL_PAGES, 0);
....
}
static void bm_page_io_async(struct drbd_bm_aio_ctx *ctx, int page_nr) __must_hold(local)
{
....
page = mempool_alloc(drbd_md_io_page_pool, __GFP_HIGHMEM|__GFP_WAIT);
copy_highpage(page, b->bm_pages[page_nr]);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists