[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1504021803170.20229@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 18:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [patch v2 4/4] mm, mempool: poison elements backed by page
allocator
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> > We don't have a need to set PAGE_EXT_DEBUG_POISON on these pages sitting
> > in the reserved pool, nor do we have a need to do kmap_atomic() since it's
> > already mapped and must be mapped to be on the reserved pool, which is
> > handled by mempool_free().
> >
>
> Hmm.. I just realized that this statement might be wrong.
> Why pages has to be mapped to be on reserved pool?
> mempool could be used for highmem pages and there is no need to kmap()
> until these pages will be used.
>
> drbd (drivers/block/drbd) already uses mempool for highmem pages:
>
Yes, you're exactly right, I didn't see this because the mempool is
created in one file and then solely used in another file, but regardless
we still need protection from this usecase.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists