[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANCZXo52sHS_2QP=mSkPayqo5A02DzN9j=m3ZQN++4v9GcTu0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:21:25 +0600
From: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Philipp Hachtmann <phacht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Emil Medve <Emilian.Medve@...escale.com>,
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memblock: add debug output for the memblock_add
2015-04-01 5:38 GMT+06:00 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>:
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:08:03 +0600 Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I guess this should be "memblock_add:". That's what
> memblock_reserve_region() does?
>
> --- a/mm/memblock.c~mm-memblock-add-debug-output-for-the-memblock_add-fix
> +++ a/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_add_
> {
> struct memblock_type *_rgn = &memblock.memory;
>
> - memblock_dbg("memblock_memory: [%#016llx-%#016llx] flags %#02lx %pF\n",
> + memblock_dbg("memblock_add: [%#016llx-%#016llx] flags %#02lx %pF\n",
> (unsigned long long)base,
> (unsigned long long)base + size - 1,
> flags, (void *)_RET_IP_);
> _
>
Yes, it is much cleaner. Thank you Andrew.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists