[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <551B5E0F.1020302@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:55:11 +0900
From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<laijs@...fujitsu.com>, <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
<tangchen@...fujitsu.com>, <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] workqueue: fix a bug when numa mapping is changed
On 2015/04/01 0:28, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Kamezawa.
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 03:09:05PM +0900, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
>> But this may be considered as API change for most hot-add users.
>
> Hmm... Why would it be? What can that possibly break?
>
Now, hot-added cpus will have the lowest free cpu id.
Because of this, in most of systems which has only cpu-hot-add, cpu-ids are always
contiguous even after cpu hot add.
In enterprise, this would be considered as imcompatibility.
determining cpuid <-> lapicid at boot will make cpuids sparse. That may corrupt
exisiting script or configuration/resource management software.
>> So, for now, I vote for detemining ids at online but record it is a good way.
>
> If we know the information during boot, let's please do it at boot
> time by all means.
I basically agree. Just thinking influence of this small imcompatibility of forcing
ideal way because of my standing point.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists