[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hwq1v4iq4.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 14:54:59 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-sh\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
"grygorii.strashko\@linaro.org" <grygorii.strashko@...aro.org>,
"linux-omap\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm\@kvack.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:47:49 +0100 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> wrote:
>
>> > -static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, free_page_t put_new_page,
>> > - unsigned long private, struct page *page, int force,
>> > - enum migrate_mode mode)
>> > +static noinline int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page,
>> > + free_page_t put_new_page,
>> > + unsigned long private, struct page *page,
>> > + int force, enum migrate_mode mode)
>> > {
>> > int rc = 0;
>> > int *result = NULL;
>> >
>>
>> Ouch. That's really ugly. And on 32bit ARM, we end-up spilling half of
>> the parameters on the stack, which is not going to help performance
>> either (not that this would be useful on 32bit ARM anyway...).
>>
>> Any chance you could make this dependent on some compiler detection
>> mechanism?
>
> With my arm compiler (gcc-4.4.4) the patch makes no difference -
> unmap_and_move() isn't being inlined anyway.
>
> How does this look?
>
> Kevin, could you please retest? I might have fat-fingered something...
Your patch on top of Geert's still compiles fine for me with gcc-4.7.3.
However, I'm not sure how specific we can be on the versions.
/me goes to test a few more compilers... OK...
ICE: 4.7.1, 4.7.3, 4.8.3
OK: 4.6.3, 4.9.2, 4.9.3
The diff below[2] on top of yours compiles fine here and at least covers
the compilers I *know* to trigger the ICE.
Kevin
[1]
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 25fd7f6291de..6e15ae3248e0 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -901,10 +901,10 @@ out:
}
/*
- * gcc-4.7.3 on arm gets an ICE when inlining unmap_and_move(). Work around
+ * gcc 4.7 and 4.8 on arm gets an ICE when inlining unmap_and_move(). Work around
* it.
*/
-#if GCC_VERSION == 40703 && defined(CONFIG_ARM)
+#if (GCC_VERSION >= 40700 && GCC_VERSION < 40900) && defined(CONFIG_ARM)
#define ICE_noinline noinline
#else
#define ICE_noinline
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists