[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150401124007.20c440cc43a482f698f461b8@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:40:07 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
"grygorii.strashko@...aro.org" <grygorii.strashko@...aro.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid
ICE in gcc 4.7.3
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:47:49 +0100 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> wrote:
> > -static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, free_page_t put_new_page,
> > - unsigned long private, struct page *page, int force,
> > - enum migrate_mode mode)
> > +static noinline int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page,
> > + free_page_t put_new_page,
> > + unsigned long private, struct page *page,
> > + int force, enum migrate_mode mode)
> > {
> > int rc = 0;
> > int *result = NULL;
> >
>
> Ouch. That's really ugly. And on 32bit ARM, we end-up spilling half of
> the parameters on the stack, which is not going to help performance
> either (not that this would be useful on 32bit ARM anyway...).
>
> Any chance you could make this dependent on some compiler detection
> mechanism?
With my arm compiler (gcc-4.4.4) the patch makes no difference -
unmap_and_move() isn't being inlined anyway.
How does this look?
Kevin, could you please retest? I might have fat-fingered something...
--- a/mm/migrate.c~mm-migrate-mark-unmap_and_move-noinline-to-avoid-ice-in-gcc-473-fix
+++ a/mm/migrate.c
@@ -901,10 +901,20 @@ out:
}
/*
+ * gcc-4.7.3 on arm gets an ICE when inlining unmap_and_move(). Work around
+ * it.
+ */
+#if GCC_VERSION == 40703 && defined(CONFIG_ARM)
+#define ICE_noinline noinline
+#else
+#define ICE_noinline
+#endif
+
+/*
* Obtain the lock on page, remove all ptes and migrate the page
* to the newly allocated page in newpage.
*/
-static noinline int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page,
+static ICE_noinline int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page,
free_page_t put_new_page,
unsigned long private, struct page *page,
int force, enum migrate_mode mode)
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists