[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150402083647.GT23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 10:36:47 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/21] time: Rework debugging variables so they aren't
global
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 09:51:51AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 08:34:41PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > > Ingo suggested that the timekeeping debugging variables
> > > recently added should not be global, and should be tied
> > > to the timekeeper's read_base.
> >
> > But why? its the same hardware clock for both tkr's. Surely if one goes
> > funny the other will too.
> >
> > It doesn't make sense to duplicate this.
>
> Well, could it be moved to the timekeeper data structure? What I was
> opposed to was making it super-global, after all the (nice) effort we
> made to tidy up global data structures in this area.
Sure, struct timekeeper would work, the debug code already references
the global tk_core to access that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists