linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] SQUASHME: Fixes to e820 handling of pmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150402094022.GA14584@lst.de>
Date:	Thu, 2 Apr 2015 11:40:22 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>,
	linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
	ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SQUASHME: Fixes to e820 handling of pmem

On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 11:37:40AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So assuming this works on your test setup I'm inclined to squash 
> Boaz's fixes into the original patch, assuming you see no outright bug 
> in them. Anything else can be done as delta improvements.

It looks sensible, but I'd really like to understand the changes a bit
better.  In the meantime I'll test them on my setup.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/